Talk:Great Warriors/@comment-5.13.69.251-20160822121349/@comment-26854521-20160828160634

After all of this you still haven't brought up any of the blog posts or forum entries that you spoke of, that make it so that your "assumption' is not an actual assumption. Something you do all the time(concerning the "it").  Presenting your own assumptions as facts without ever backing them up, but then at the same time disregarding other assumptions as baseless.

Funny that you bring up the Enryu discussion. I hope you're still convinced that Enryu must have been on the Hell Train, because the GoG stated that it's his job to train Irregulars, that's exactly on the same level of logic as this one.

And I don't see a reason to point out your logical fallacies, because you seem incapable of seeing even basic logic (like the Enryu thing).

The Ari Han bit. You use circular reasoning. Let's just assume that SIU actually did present the ranks 1-15 to introduce the 10 Great Warriors, you're already assuming that it's not synonymous with Family Head, something you're actually trying to prove. And even if that were the case, how do you come up with that logic? He is mentioned in a certain context so he has to be a main part of it?

In this case you have to make one assumption, whether you want to or not. The choice is between

a) assuming that Family Head and Great Warrior are synonymous and add the new Family Head or

b)make up a huge story line, in which the 10th Great Warrior died or something similar and someone else took his place.

You (I or someone else) could also do what I said and add the Family Head with a side note or add unknown, with a side note that it's probably/potentially the Lo Po Bo Bia Family Head.

If i ever went with b) as you do this time, you would probably tell me to google Occam's razor or something like that xD.