Talk:White/@comment-24015369-20160908092647/@comment-28686446-20160909202517

Yeah I know its not really good analogy, but that doesn't really matter, my point wasn't really conceiving best analogy which would lead to some kind of paradox or something. I was only trying to show it can lead to many more (possibly not so related) questions which one would normally find ridiculous, and for only that reason alone it seems "easier" to dismiss that possibility all together. But anyway, lets concieve better analogy which would lead to some kind of paradox, shall we? (also quite philosophical, but bear with me) So lets say White is defined as composite of all these souls (siblings plus others which he consumed), you are questioning whether it's still White even after he lost part of these souls forever right? So what about opposite? What if he would to consume billions of more people? If you say its still White we agree, however if you say no, it's somebody else. And what if he would consume 100 people? 10? or 1? You would always need to define another version of White like White v.2 and v.10000 and so on and so on. It doesn't make any sense. Also please notice on definition of White it shouldn't matter if he is gaining something which he never had, or loosing something which he can't regain. For me this reasoning extends even on siblings, but I know its probably complete overkill.

Well I should end it here since it's already long enough so I just wana say this: I don't really care whether on this page is deceased or not, it depends on your definition and its really semantics. I just saw debate I knew i would find amusing so I couldn't help it and I had to jump in :) after all we are part of one family right? right?.... no? kk never mind :/

P.S If somebody still disagree, could you point out where is main difference between Baams transformation after receiving thorn and Whites? Just curious.