Talk:Arlen Grace/@comment-11507893-20170307160759/@comment-26484417-20170314151850

@Tathra: For the first bit, you're factually wrong, which makes it an appeal to consequences fallacy. This wikia is essentially built on SIU's blog posts and the events that transpired in the story; what the characters claim is always given much more scrutiny and doubt until we have some kind of secondary input on the matter. For instance, do you think that Alphine's stalling story alone would make us fill-in Elaine's history section if we didn't also get Elaine's flashbacks and "remarks" that corroborate it?

In this case, we have a source that is--by her own admission--uncertain on the matter, as well as a directly related individual who is yet to be fully convinced of the fact, so why should / how can the article exhibit any kind of certainty?

Rest seemingly pertains uniquely to the discussion with EternET, so I'm going to leave here.