Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31297098-20170220151321/@comment-26484417-20170220225419

Well, that's not necessarily the case. While High Rankers--especially the top100--are able to perform any position to the satisfaction of a generic High Ranker, this is unlikely to apply to comparison against their immediate peers (i.e., other top100). Same with GW being compared to other top100, and GW being compared to other GW, and so on. The appropriate context is very important.

You can observe the same with Regulars as well: Given what we have seen--and assuming they have the equipment--an average C-Regular should be able to easily take on any position and perform better than an average F-Regular in their chosen position. However, when they are compared to other average C-Regulars, they can likely only compare when performing in their chosen position(s).

NOTE: At the very least this is my belief; if the context isn't important, then there would be no point to indicate positions when talking about the 10GW. And the Ha Yurin entry explaining her Fisherman-Scout double position would make no sense.