Talk:Dragon's Breath/@comment-25346948-20160925154755/@comment-26484417-20160926111515

@Demotivator: You're right, I was under the impression that the pages were more specific as to the number of Baangs; either I saw it someplace and generalised, or it used to be in the now obsolete versions of some articles.

It's true, we can definitely explain the naming convention for this technique, but there should be no reason to make dedicated sub-sections covering "Three Dragons" and "Six Dragons" respectively, since the only content difference between two would be the number of Baangs used.

@All: I would personally keep the "Dragon's Breath" name, and simply include the additional naming convention (i.e., indicator of Baangs) somewhere in the article.