Talk:Angel/@comment-108.45.107.65-20160922142754/@comment-26484417-20160923170132

Well, for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th paragraph, we can only speculate whether these concerns actually have any effect or not.

As for the last paragraph, you're wrong. If Ron Mei had been addressed as "Angel", we would have an objective reason to think that Angel is being addressed as "Angel" for the same reason. However, in the current situation, the suggestion is instead that her case is different in this regard (i.e., her title became her identity--don't forget that 'Angel' is also a legitimate name). My original comment already mentioned this, however briefly.