Talk:Rachel/@comment-28627855-20160602115507/@comment-28627855-20160603130033

Thanks for being gentle; I was concerned I would be berated for being too contrary.

             I would argue that Emile is Rachel’s Thorn, as an actual Thorn would be wasted on a light bearer. I also just like the notion of Baam and Rachel being equals and since their positions work well together I’d even suggest that Rachel will be Baam’s final power-up (not by her death enraging him, too cliché).

             As to my pet theory, every time I read the first season Rachel’s lines have a different tone leading to a new theory on her and her early intentions: casual tone yields person in a strange world but it was a mistake, manipulative tone yields deliberate programming, and a morose tone yields suicidal intentions. I can even do this with just the quotes on the wikia page. About the child living in a cave with no mention of food, I view that the same as a person (Baam) being unconscious for five days with no mention of fluid infusions; it is just not worth mentioning (sorry about this being a baseless counter).

             Anyway, I’ll shut up now since I really just want to read the theories without having to sift through LINE quality comments. Also, this is just me learning how to reply to a reply.