Talk:Twenty-Fifth Baam/@comment-85.167.88.229-20170205215938/@comment-26484417-20170206152348

@Tony: I suppose it's not implemented for the same reason why there aren't any laws against revealing female clothing implemented as a response for sexual harassments and assaults. Not exactly apt analogy, but the idea behind is stunningly similar; for as long as the user uses a Spoiler tag, even if the content can be seen on Wiki Activity page, it's perfectly fine.

If you use Wiki Activity page or other non-filtered Wiki view like that, you implicitly express your desire to view the Wiki as it is without any filtering mechanics; in other words you would see the spoiler content even if someone then went back and fixed the original post with the solution you propose. If you want to see the Wiki as-is, then you cannot complain about seeing it.

The only people who cannot help this are admins and moderators, who are expected to view everything as-is as part of their duties, and who are therefore the only people who can complain about seeing spoilers in this manner despite their wish to avoid them. Fortunately, to my knowledge there is only one admin bothered by spoilers, and that's Demotivator. And, be it intentional or not, Adat and I--oftentimes with EternET's pointed finger--take care of spoiler censorship as soon as spoiler is identified so that Demotivator isn't as exposed to them.