Thread:Demotivator/@comment-26484417-20161012113013/@comment-26484417-20161013235725

We already have "class" (aka classification) field, and it's being used to denote whether the technique is offensive, defensive, or support. My original intention after "type" was to go with "category" but that's basically the same thing as class, so there is a potentially confusing overlap.

Right now we have "type" for Shinsoo Type (e.g., Flow Control), "group" for Technique Group (e.g., Weapon Technique), and "class" for Class / Classification (e.g., Offensive). If it were up to me, I would do something like this:  "Shinsoo Type" into "Shinsoo" or "Shinsoo Manipulation" (id "shinsoo") "Technique Group" into "Classification" or "Category" (id "class") "Class" into "Purpose" or "Focus" (id "purpose" or "focus")  What do you say? I realise such changes would require edits of the code of every existing Shinsoo technique template instance, but I should be able to manage that since there aren't *that* many of them (yet). =P

I agree with all the names you suggest, except for that last item. We can go with "Reinforcement Technique" without the subject specification, and then let the technique tell what it reinforces instead.