Talk:Enryu/@comment-28805348-20160705184138/@comment-26484417-20160706160633

@Tony: My apologies, I actually hadn't noticed there was a comment by you between Red Shinsoo's and mine until now.

As for your first paragraph, I have no issue with that speculation; it recognises that no Guardian can design contract that is more powerful than they are. And the specifics of the contract are really just a guess at this point, so we're free to speculate.

About your second paragraph, I suspect that there is a difference between Zahard's and Kaiser's contracts. Zahard's contract is only ever described as "he cannot be killed by X", which should mean that he can be beaten, mangled, probably even dismembered for as long as the act cannot result in Zahard's death. Kaiser, on the other hand, cannot even be attacked outside the right circumstances.

That said, there can also be a similarity between the contracts. If we try to conceptualise the situation, there should be some kind of "layer" around Kaiser that determines whether the attack is allowed (e.g., attack from the challenged individual), or whether the attack isn't allowed. If the attack isn't allowed, the "layer" blocks the attack and disintegrates the attacker (don't ask me how this "layer" deals with AoE attacks). And this could mean that Zahard also has similar kind of "layer" around him, that "simply" denies any attack that has lethal potential.