Talk:Position/@comment-26484417-20160102202919/@comment-26484417-20160103102632

Your example may not be an accurate analogy. Crusader indicates behaviour, while Real Fisherman indicates capability. If the definition of Real Fisherman goes "perfect fighter who can fight in all kind of battles", it suggests that those who aren't Real Fisherman are imperfect fighters who cannot fight in all kind of battles, or at least aren't up to that standard.

Let me correct my original question (or maybe the one from the other thread). At this time, the Real Fisherman can either be (a) the ultimate form of the Fisherman position, or (b) a title that denotes the perfect combatant regardless of the position.

Both A and B indicate there must be some threshold that marks the difference between those who are Real Fisherman and those who aren't (not really important at this point). But the true question is whether it's the "evolved" version of the Fisherman position, or just something anyone can attain. =)

I'm not entirely sure what Rak originally meant, but I suspect he meant it as "frontliner", "melee badass", or his general equivalent for "the hunter". Basically the exact opposite of Spear Bearers on 2F, who are exclusively trained at long-range...