Talk:10 Great Families/@comment-27218075-20160823004700/@comment-26874771-20160824023212

I was going to mention the competing aspect of it but decided to leave my comment as a joke. and i dont know why you are so obsessed with the fact that Koon AAs branch has been cut off, them being cut off does not explain the difference between a direct descendant and a branch member. Only thing im getting from that is a Direct bloodline member can be treated the same as a Branch member when it comes to being outcasted. It doesnt matter if the politics say Koon AA is no longer a direct line or he is no longer considered a Koon, because he still has their blood no matter what they say until he dies he is still a (Direct line) Koon. It may not be in name to them but the fact still remains... Your point about different generations made more sense to me Rachel. But to me it seems the question should be what determines the generation? when the word generation is used in that way i think of age and if we base it off that aspect then there are to many factors. The main problem to me with that is the so called kids like AA who are actually really old but are still considered kids so what generation does their lifespan fall under you get me? Or are we just going to assume that there are only 2 generations? Pure blood interbreeding = 1st generation and all branch members are 2nd generation? Honestly i think we should just wait for SIU on this one instead of trying to guess imo.

Anyway can a branch family be like a Koon family member getting married to a Eurasia family member because that also would seem valid to me to consider them branch members of both families.