Thread:FUG.L!F3/@comment-4682748-20170307173349/@comment-26484417-20170307182907

The original "군주" should mean "monarch", which may mean--though it by no means specifies--that he was a king.

I'm not sure where the "warlord" came from, but it's possible the reasoning behind it was something like this: (1) Monarch + (2) Great Warrior = (3) Warring Monarch.And this may have eventually lead someone to call him a "Warlord". Though, obviously, this very line of reasoning would make Zahard into a Warlord instead of a King too.