Talk:Adori Zahard/@comment-26656354-20150728091815/@comment-26484417-20151230195448

Hence my remark "...even that can be easily questioned". That entirely depends on how you approach the statement, whether you're literal and to what degree, etc etc... For instance, you can argue for family from the biological side, I can argue for family from the socio-political side, and then SIU comes with "oh, she's actually an artificial / manifested being with no family whatsoever"... =P

As for the second part, I originally remarked that, depending on the circumstances, the 'unknown' and 'some family' can either be equal, or the latter holds greater informative value. It doesn't matter if you cannot imagine the scenario where the 'some family' holds greater informative value, because it truly would be a very special case. I included it only for the sake of completeness. Nonetheless, for as long as we agree that 'unknown' and 'some family' are essentially equal, the tone of the theories shouldn't be affected.