Talk:Arlen Grace/@comment-11507893-20170307160759/@comment-6166034-20170313091331

Very simple we have much contradictions in the explanations in this precise chapter. Ex: How do you make sense of "raised you" if Jahad "killed the child not long after it was born"? Meaning we can take whatever "quote" we like most, that doesn't make the "Arlene's baby is Baam" more plausible. I'm of the mind that Baam is the child/boy of the prophecy, hence the result of the child's body ressurection, however it doesn't have to mean it's still Arlene's baby, nor Baam doesn't have to be the "only" result of that(is there a place for Rachel in that theory?)= We can concider "Baam" something/body different from the dead baby.