Thread:Athanos/@comment-26372735-20170311165602/@comment-26484417-20170311171651

For the first bit, upon reaching reaching third warning, or repeating the same transgression in the same article, I'm going to ban you; does this answer your question?

As for the rest, I didn't give you a warning because you uploaded information you cannot substantiate--though I would be happy to--, but because your edit degraded the content. This literally qualifies as a mal-edit; I'm pretty sure I mentioned that with the warning.

Again, you keep throwing around the "no matter how you feel about it", but there is no more proof than there has been before; there is a logical fallacy that explains this approach. In fact, you still cannot even refute that one alternative interpretation of Garam's words, and there is really nothing to discuss until we know enough to refute at least something as trivial as a variant interpretation. Once this is possible, we may still not have enough to substantiate the fact one way or another, but at least there may be some point in discussing the matter.

Cheers!