Talk:Position/@comment-26484417-20151128004514/@comment-26484417-20151129225743

@Demotivator: Also, if there is sufficient gap in power, then it's not longer about positions one way or the other... If you can eliminate the opponent by sneezing (like Urek vs. the 3 Rankers), the positions and skill-set are irrelevant. If this is what you meant from the beginning, then I can see where the confusion lies... You can only judge the 10 Great Warriors by comparing them to those who are on their level, which is the only comparison that matters. Otherwise, there would be no need to designate position for literally any Ranker, considering the weakest Ranker can still outperform 2F Regular in any position.

What you wrote toward the end " it's natural for people to go either way, but more so in expanding their skillset (e.g. to cover any flaws and weaknesses they may have) " is something fully covered by the paragraph you copy&pasted... So why do you disagree with it? If you wonder which part of the paragraph, this line covers what you described: " characters who belong to a single position and acquire skills / techniques that enhance their performance when performing this one position ".

I confess to the football blasphemy, though... =P