Talk:Rachel/@comment-28619018-20161008160548/@comment-2226693-20161022092001

I think it would be more fair to say we are blind to each others position. I never get tired of the hero winning, for me it is not whether or not they win, but how they win. Oh and how much pain the villains experience. Like I said, I enjoy (somewhat) the noble demon, but the entitled bastard? Nope. It would be different if Rachel had SOME redeeming qualities, but she doesn't. Even her earlier kindness to Baam seems to be nothing but manipulation. By contrast, that is why I love Baam. He is as close to a true hero as exists in this setting. Sure he is not perfect, but he owns his mistakes (which are WAY less heinous that Rachel's) and tries to be better. He inspires others to be better too. Most of the "heroes" in this setting are of the anti variety. He is closer to a genuine hero. Which is also why I want him to tear down FUG and the Zahard and kill all the floor Guardians as I am pretty sure they are all villains too, and Rachel. I would be perfectly happy if he wen full Godmode. As long as it was humiliating and VERY painful for the villains, I am good. The sad part is, I would totally be sympathetic to her, if she were not a completely honorless character. When Khun made a fool of her and Hoaqin was a jerk, I knew that any other character I would have felt bad for, but not her. She reminds me of Umbridge from Potter. Just a horrible, reprehensible person without any redeeming qualities. Not all villains are even like that.