Talk:Great Warriors/@comment-5.13.69.251-20160822121349/@comment-26484417-20160828135816

I haven't mentioned what "it" is? I clearly mention that it's the entire latter part after I addressed the first part; nothing unclear about it. If you need an elaboration on 'argument from consequences', then I recommend you first google what it means, because my invocation of this fallacy should become quite clear immediately thereafter and there was really nothing more to say on the issue.

Also, "It is also an assumption from you that the information from the first paragraph is no longer valid. And I surely don't see a "convincing suggestion" in this case, especially since the matter about the Lo Po Bo Bia, does not seem to be an in-universe secret. Alphine explained some things to the characters, and there was no mention of such a peculiar past, maybe because she doesn't know it herself, or for some other reason, it doesn't really matter." I must have missed the part where you express your uncertainty, or pose the question for clarification; it's clearly my mistake. That you express uncertainty and question only after you're faced with a reaction to what you wrote isn't really something that concerns me.

As for the context, Ari Han was actually mentioned at the time; he's introduced in Ha Yurin's profile. And even if Ari Han weren't mentioned, the context would still be there, Ari Han would merely be outside of it and also an unknown.