Talk:Eurasia Enne Zahard/@comment-26484417-20170227123258/@comment-26484417-20170228104549

The second part didn't have any question in it, not even a rhetorical one.

In any case, you're right that I didn't cover this bit in my original comment. However, that was because many readers here may not even notice that there is any visual difference between "엔" (En) and "앤" (Aen), while they are sure to notice the visual difference between "엔" (En) and "안" (An). Not quite the same--not at all to those who have any idea about Korean--, but when one has to shift from the original "ㅔ" to the convenient "ㅐ" just to get the common "Anne" out of it, one might as well have gone from "ㅔ" to "ㅏ" in the translation world. They may be very similar sounds, but they are not the same, and the distinction should matter in general and even more so when it comes to names.

In other words, one can either go with the original "En", which can be further changed to the unique "Enne"--because this change doesn't violate the convention, and because it looks better to be honest--, or one can alter the original to "Aen" and then go with the common "Anne". Because the latter involves (1) change--however minute--to the original, and (2) translator's escape to a common word, my sentiment stands.