Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-218.51.114.149-20140720142949/@comment-23777750-20140725173224

Demotivator wrote:

Well it's good to know you are literate. But my original point more-or-less still stands: they're a bigger/more powerful organisation (thus giving them said authority) which is what unanimously makes them the 'official' translators.

Since I'm not Korean (nor can I speak or read it) I cannot speculate on whether the Korean-to-English is better in LINE or not. However from the general gist of most of these replies, it seems like all of us ToG Wiki editors are gonna keep the translations we've got anyway, even if only temporarily, before we start proceeding with a major ToG wiki translational overhaul.

Your point is wrong, Naver having authority over webtoons because its not because Naver is bigger/more powerful organisation that gives them instant authority, but its because they had copyright for their webtoons from the beginning. They are the ones picking up and paying authors so they can start drawing webtoons at first place.

Instead of your none speculation, being Korean and I can tell you which names are better because they follow original Korean names better. LINE ones.

(But on overall quality of translations,I can clearly see they have seriously done lazy job with simplie mistakes all over.)

Examples:

Androssi vs Endrosi.

Original Korean name is 엔도르시

엔 sounds as Ehne

도 sounds as do

르 soudns as r/l (there is only middle sound for these in Korean)

시 sounds as si

Clearly Endorsi sounds closer to original.

Hatsu vs Hatz

하 soudns as Ha

츠 sounds as ts/tz (no u/oo sound.)