Talk:Shinwonryu/@comment-26484417-20180115114453

Just to note something, certain people have cited Cletus' analysis on Bato.to, but I would like to point out that his analysis is flawed. He clearly looked into the linguistic portion of the issue, and I see no reason to disagree there, but the result actually offers a degree of validity to the association with black holes--it certainly doesn't disprove it.

Regardless of which of the viable translations one prefers, there is a clear association with creation and origin, and these are / were (depending on whom you ask) commonly associated with super-massive black holes in the realm of physics... as well as in a fair few fantasy titles. The issue is, as far as I'm concerned, whether SIU considered and intended this association to be there, and whether it's preferable translation.

We can argue about what SIU intended to no avail, but while I would argue that the bias-free "Origin Style" is a much better translation, the "Black Hole Style" translation is definitely not as much nonsense as some people might think; it's just a cringe-worthy translation choice.